4 ms·
If he didn't create $450B in value, then his pay package isn't $56B as everyone is quoting. Those are valued in the same "hype-dollars." The "He didn't do anyt
by aikinai 2y ago
If he didn't create $450B in value, then his pay package isn't $56B as everyone is quoting. Those are valued in the same "hype-dollars."
The "He didn't do anything valuable anyway" and "His pay package is too valuable" arguments are in direct contradiction.
- shafyy 2y agoThe market cap of a company is not real money. However, owning a significant share of the shares can help rich people get real money without any real downsides. For example, Musk (any most billionaires) use their stock as collateral and take out super low interest loans against that stock. They don't pay any income tax on this loan, since it's not income. On the contrary, they can deduct the interest rate payments from their tax bill. This money they then use to buy property and other wealth. So, they make more money with not really their money (debt) and they use all tricks in the book to minimize their tax burden - which is much lower compared to (relatively speaking) low and middle class folks who earn most of their money through income and pay high income taxes. So, you see, even though his pay package is in Tesla stock and its value therefore "not real", he uses it to get very real cash using it. In finance this is called "leverage".
- bravetraveler 2y agoIn fact, things get rather bad when that money is realized at once. Hype is accurate.
- smsm42 2y agoNobody pays ang income tax on loans, it's not unique to Musk. And loans need to be returned, usually.