4 ms·
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIEVrBLmF70 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIEVrBLmF70 I was curious to see if there was a video of it being done and this see
by encodedrose 2y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIEVrBLmF70 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIEVrBLmF70
I was curious to see if there was a video of it being done and this seems to be it. Incredibly delicate is an understatement.
- po 2y agoThank you for looking it up! Is there a name for the practice of embedding a completely unrelated video into the middle of an article? I find this practice to be so mystifying. Does that work on readers?
- readthenotes1 2y ago[dead]
- monero-xmr 2y agoThose vanilla plants can go fuck themselves. But seriously
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- Hitton 2y agoThanks, it beggars belief that they could publish the article without such substantial piece of information.
- swayvil 2y agoMaybe it was written by an AI. I'm serious. That a human would leave out that crucial component is indeed boggling. An AI. Writing and publishing a stream of mid-quality articles. With ads inserted. Profit. Occasionally insane.
- vintagedave 2y agoHere's a strange quote from it: > In the early 1800s, it was introduced to the Netherlands and France, where it ... became a hit with Elizabeth I, among other royals Elizabeth I was English and died in 1603. Two centuries before the 1800s. I am suspicious of AI for this article too.
- vundercind 2y agoNearly every place that has writers on staff for any purpose is trying to have 1/4 as many (at most) just edit AI output. The way they tune productivity is deliberately reducing quality of the editing. I’m not kidding.