4 ms·
To make it more equitable, my uni was the ancestor of SBF's alma mater (bureaucratically as well as vexillarily). If that's too much travail, consider that its
by vinnyvichy 2y ago
To make it more equitable, my uni was the ancestor of SBF's alma mater (bureaucratically as well as vexillarily).
If that's too much travail, consider that its location is the namesake of an oikos that perpetually draws in a certain Homeric hero.
- 082349872349872 2y agoOne hint too many! I have been taught that "it's ${LOCATION}ing" is the english equivalent of « il pleuvine », and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40244602 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40244602 ought to have billions and billions of connections. (none of which involve Leontine S) Lagniappe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JhdMPkA0YM&t=120s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JhdMPkA0YM&t=120s (as for me, one of my friends is on the faculty, studying among other things quiver varieties, which brings us full circle back to Penelope, who set up the competition with Odysseus' bow. If it were an asian recurve bow, it makes sense that the suitors might've tried to string it backwards, and if it were a horseback bow, the draw weight for its size might easily have been such that only someone who knew the foot trick for stringing would've managed)
- vinnyvichy 2y agoHe'd better not be also studying cdS, because that hits too close to oikos. (Acronym because I need any now or ever other lurkers on this thread to work just a wee harder)
- 082349872349872 2y agoAs long as you're far from H15 (wk*kufbw?), then all is well. Otherwise I fear the vexillary varieties may indeed be waving from his (not a Tits building) field pavilion.
- vinnyvichy 2y agoAh alright, I gather that particular dimension 2^{5-1}-1 should still be helpful at some point.. Here's a ... my response to that as a theoretical engineer https://youtu.be/v5ev-RAg7Xs https://youtu.be/v5ev-RAg7Xs (1:10 Every property a feature! (See comments for less obvious takes with regards to your coalescence hierarchies)) Your geneticists? https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/hair.pdf https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/... EDIT: ahhh missed that it's already frontpaged PEE: looks like the usual nonconfrontational juxtaposition of the tribes ("they use our words but not our theorems") https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40693845 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40693845
- vinnyvichy 2y agoSection 5.1 lemma of Gr. As Physics for the staid hens, So Flags for the rabid fens https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/bruy%C3%A8re https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/bruy%C3%A8re (Root of Bruhat?)
- 082349872349872 2y agoSorry, not Hⁿ (or even Ext), but a particular problem from the bloke who claimed we must (deontic necessity) know and will (dynamic) know. Maybe it would've been clearer as H15/23? (if we were chemists, H₁₅ would sound very unstable)
- vinnyvichy 2y agoGnoramus et gnorabimus? (Personal preference: H13.) But if we were physicists H₁₅ would have a rich inner life https://physics.aps.org/articles/v13/142 https://physics.aps.org/articles/v13/142
- 082349872349872 2y agoand if we were (Jungian?) psychologists, having a rich inner life and being very unstable would be perfectly compatible. "Gnoramus et gnorabimus?" is absolutely gusting, btw...