4 ms·
The US has frozen national assets before, most notable Iran but the big difference this time is that the US is now openly considering confiscating those assets
by Mountain_Skies 2y ago
The US has frozen national assets before, most notable Iran but the big difference this time is that the US is now openly considering confiscating those assets and giving them to another country just because it has the ability to do so. Even Iran, who for decades was considered part of the "Axis of Evil" had its frozen assets kept in reserve until they were eventually given back. It really feels like the powers that be are now people who have no consideration for anything they can't see past the horizon and have unwavering faith that "it'll all just work out in the end somehow". They're becoming reckless on so many levels and unfortunately the public, or at least the loudest voices, are happy to cheer them on.
Even if the US ultimately doesn't turn over Russian assets to Ukraine, just making the threat to do so is globally destructive to faith in the current system that greatly benefits the United States.
- theendisney 2y agoIts not genocide when I say it isnt is not convincing anyone, all we see is the once mighty uncle sam groveling at the feet of some small country that just happens to control the entire us government. People mistakenly think it is about Palestinans or Israelies.
- Paradigma11 2y agoI disagree. If things had moved in the same trajectory as the last decades a decline of the current system seemed inevitable. So why not use that power while you still have it. Also considering the state of most BRICS countries, it does not seem so certain that there will be viable alternatives to the current system.