The article or the report don't give a single example of what they think was wrongly removed when it was just "general expression of opinion". So I'm quite cri

The article or the report don't give a single example of what they think was wrongly removed when it was just "general expression of opinion". So I'm quite critical of this kind of platform enforced censorship, but I'm not really convinced on this case that it's not just a different interpretation of what free speech means and what hate speech is between US Americans and Europeans, as is common in these discussions.