4 ms·
Search on Rumble/bitchute for the Senator Ron Johnson hearing featuring vaccine-injured from the original Pfizer vaccine trial, whose injuries were then exclude
by robxorb 2y ago
Search on Rumble/bitchute for the Senator Ron Johnson hearing featuring vaccine-injured from the original Pfizer vaccine trial, whose injuries were then excluded from the trial results despite clearly having been caused by the vaccine.
Considering how limited the trials were, it's difficult to conclude the wider number would be vanishingly small, given even just one or two incorrect exclusions of vaccine-caused injury, which could reasonably happen even by chance.
Given the context that Pfizer has been repeatedly tried and criminally convicted for highly unethical practices and fined in the billions for it - along with the rest of big-pharma - it's unfair to regard the suspicious as "fucking idiots".
Certainly, the characterisation offends me, as I personally know multiple people who were definitely injured directly by the COVID vaccine, of every major variety: Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, and Moderna.
Statistically, that should simply not be the case, were these "mRNA" injections as safe as they were marketed to be.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- Izkata 2y agoThere was a substack where someone took the deaths during Pfizer's trial (the same one where 95% effective came from) and compared it to the CDC's estimate of number of injections to prevent a death, they came up with something insane like 5 vaccine-caused deaths to prevent 1 virus-caused death. Major caveats were included because all the numbers were small (IIRC it was 16 deaths in the vaccine group and 14 deaths in the control group, for example), but it otherwise checked out. That said, also keep in mind the much-touted 95% effective came from 8 and 170 cases out of around 40000 participants.