> Every programming language has parts like Rust’s unsafe. This is a pretty weak argument. "Everyone else does it, so it's not wrong." If using this argument,

> Every programming language has parts like Rust’s unsafe. This is a pretty weak argument. "Everyone else does it, so it's not wrong." If using this argument, Rust shouldn't even exist. Rice's theorem seems handwavy in the real-world limitations of its restrictions. For the sake of argument, even Python is more memory-safe than unsafe Rust.