The story is poor, the conclusion maybe accurate in that it's likely a non-story: > Qualcomm bought a company called Nuvia to do this, and it originally used

The story is poor, the conclusion maybe accurate in that it's likely a non-story: > Qualcomm bought a company called Nuvia to do this, and it originally used Nuvia's architectural license. Arm's argument is that the Nuvia license was canceled when it was taken over by Qualcomm. A new deal would have to be negotiated if that holds up in court. > So, there you have it. Arm wants Qualcomm to stop shipping the product it's been contesting, but to be honest, that's not usually how these things end. It's unlikely that any product will be delayed from hitting shelves. These cases tend to end with one company giving a bucket of cash to the other, and everyone moves on.