3 ms·
I don't think this falls under the responsibility of the AI provider. Gun makers are perfectly happy with their guns killing innocent people.
by eddd-ddde 2y ago
I don't think this falls under the responsibility of the AI provider.
Gun makers are perfectly happy with their guns killing innocent people.
- mock-possum 2y agoPerfectly happy, sure, but also desperately afraid that they’ll someday be held even partially responsible - which is why they spend millions in lobbying to prevent laws and advertising / outreach to curry favour.
- roywiggins 2y agoThere is a shield law for gun manufacturers, there isn't one for LLM products (unless you want to stretch Section 230 to beyond its breaking point) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_of_Lawful_Commerce_in_Arms_Act https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protection_of_Lawful_Commerc...
- ImJamal 2y agoThere are the same laws for pretty much everything. If somebody buys a car and runs down a crowd of people (not due to some defect in the car) you can't sue the car company and dealership. It is the same as guns. We just had to explicitly have laws around guns because some people wanted guns to be held to a different standard then everything else.
- boy_thrway 2y ago[flagged]
- eddd-ddde 2y agoThat's the point. People use guns to kill people the same way people can use AI to make bad things. Either both are okay or both are wrong.