5 ms·
Except for the fact that Face ID is completely on device in the secure enclave and not even Apple can access the data stored there soooooo…..
by ryaneager 2y ago
Except for the fact that Face ID is completely on device in the secure enclave and not even Apple can access the data stored there soooooo…..
- shmeeed 2y agoThat's sure cool for Face ID. Now all that's missing is the same level of faith in all the rest.
- dwighttk 2y agoWho has ~1.8 billion centrally stored faces?
- vundercind 2y agoSome retailers are probably not far off.
- dylan604 2y agoFacebook
- HnUser12 2y agoIndian government does. Fortunately not face scans. But pictures, retinal scan and fingerprints.
- BoorishBears 2y agoDoes that mean you're ok with Face ID?
- MrDrMcCoy 2y agoStoring the biometric data securely in the digital enclave only covers half the problem. The other half is in the form of falsifying said biometrics to gain access to a device, or physically forcing the actual person to unlock it against their will. With keys that are only stored in my mind, I have the ability to consciously decide that access should or should not be granted.
- elzbardico 2y agoStudies have shown that amongst human subjects there's a really strong correlation between an economic agent having a gun pointed by someone else at their heads and conciously making choices that posit a positive utility increase for the ones holding the gun.
- MrDrMcCoy 2y agoMaybe so, but it's still their choice in that instance. Some data is with dying to protect.
- 1oooqooq 2y agomost govt implementing face identification is NOT on device. all the on-device stuff was just to ease the tech literati who probably is still 12 years away from being impacted by the actual tech doing the damage, since those are for the poor and foreigners first
- driverdan 2y agoSo long as Apple can change the software on the device they can get access to the Face ID data, or someone who forces them to do it can.