If anything the opposite -- the lower court had ruled that the organization _did_ have standing to challenge the approval of mifepristone, and the Supreme Court

If anything the opposite -- the lower court had ruled that the organization _did_ have standing to challenge the approval of mifepristone, and the Supreme Court overruled that. If they had done nothing then that would have _reduced_ access to mifepristone by rolling back the FDA's expansions (that is, the requirement for in-person doctor's consultation would have been reinstated)