For anyone getting just reading the headline, the thing at issue was an injunction to “reinstate the workers while the agency's in-house administrative case aga

For anyone getting just reading the headline, the thing at issue was an injunction to “reinstate the workers while the agency's in-house administrative case against the Seattle-based company proceeds”. With the SCOTUS ruling, the decision on that injunction will just occur again, but with a different legal test. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) could still get the same injunction for the workers under the new test, though it is apparently more difficult. The overall case against Starbucks could still be won or lost, and the legal tests for that haven’t changed. The decision was essentially 9-0 with Justice Jackson dissenting in part but concurring in judgement.