4 ms·
I'm always curious! I suppose we can call this one nearly unanimous? I skimmed her dissent and couldn't make much sense of it, seemed to be pretty technical?
by blakesterz 2y ago
I'm always curious! I suppose we can call this one nearly unanimous? I skimmed her dissent and couldn't make much sense of it, seemed to be pretty technical?
- The_Kevin_Ruse 2y agoShe concurred in the judgement, so she agrees that Starbucks should have won. She was only dissenting on the reasoning behind it. The judgement was unanimous.
- voxic11 2y agoThe dissent concurred in the judgement just disagreed with the reasoning for how it was arrived at.
- tekla 2y agoShe agreed with everything, just didn't want to join the majority due to disliking that the court ignored the way Congress wanted the court to act.
- pclmulqdq 2y agoDespite the politics around the court and the idea that the court is divided, most Supreme Court decisions are unanimous or close to it. Opinions like this one provide alternate legal theories to use later.