2 ms·
It's not that she is particularly 'controversial', it is that she is biased and misleading. She is an economist who wrote a book that misrepresents, ignores an
by shkkmo 2y ago
It's not that she is particularly 'controversial', it is that she is biased and misleading.
She is an economist who wrote a book that misrepresents, ignores and twists science what does know about childrearing and then presents that with a high level of confidence.
- slothtrop 2y agoThis is a projection. Oster seems to do the opposite, cast skepticism on overconfidence of certain ideals using data as a guide, or criticizing the lack of it or the rigor of studies leaned on.