3 ms·
> While an API key and explicit user action were always needed to use AI features, some users asked for an impenetrable firewall for safety and regulatory purpo
by PreInternet01 2y ago
> While an API key and explicit user action were always needed to use AI features, some users asked for an impenetrable firewall for safety and regulatory purposes
Yes, some users are truly experts at driving Open Source developers to the point of burnout.
I use iTerm2, in pretty sensitive environments, where 'OK, you didn't enable this feature', closely followed by 'not that we had Internet access here anyway, LOL' were (though-experimentally, as are all the 'concerns' of 'some users') eclipsed by 'hey, why is it a thing to enter sensitive data on command lines anyway -- should we not have ways to avoid that?'
- mbauman 2y agoIronically, so many of these users are those _with corporate support_. And demanding "IT" support from the open source project. Without consideration.
- PreInternet01 2y agoOh, sure. But for me, the lack of self-awareness in "my command line inputs include extremely sensitive identifiers all the time, and this is fine, if it weren't for your optional AI plugins" is especially grating. So, like, if I ever happen to execute 'history' in any session of yours that I manage to get access to, I hit the jackpot?
- gaws 2y ago> I use iTerm2, in pretty sensitive environments Like where?