3 ms·
What was being boycotted? Their revenue? Developers choosing to not use their terminal?
by bdcravens 2y ago
What was being boycotted? Their revenue? Developers choosing to not use their terminal?
- walthamstow 2y agoAs far as I can tell the 'boycott' was nothing more than rolling back to 3.4
- swiftcoder 2y agoThat is indeed how one usually boycotts software updates. What else would it mean?
- bdcravens 2y agoUninstalling and moving to an alternative. In the case of open source, forking the project.
- swiftcoder 2y agoA bunch of us didn't install the update that included GPT integration. From the release notes, it appears that it was enough of a dip in updates to prompt corrective actions from the developers
- bdcravens 2y agoIs that communication and feedback, or a boycott? For a boycott to be effective, you have to be taking something away from someone. In the case of free software, the work has already been done, for free.