4 ms·
Warning from an old Usenet fungus newsgroup: "If you collect fungi to eat you should always take three samples: one for the pot, one for the doctor and one for
by tristramb 2y ago
Warning from an old Usenet fungus newsgroup: "If you collect fungi to eat you should always take three samples: one for the pot, one for the doctor and one for the coroner."
- zikduruqe 2y agoOr "There are bold mushroom foragers, and there are old mushroom foragers. But there are no bold, old mushroom foragers."
- fanf2 2y ago'All Fungi are edible. Some fungi are only edible once.' — Terry Pratchett
- hinkley 2y agoMy partner has anxiety problems and did not entirely appreciate when I told her where a raw sample of the mushrooms I planted, harvested and positively IDed (stropharia) were in the fridge before I ate a small piece of them. And then the next day when I re-iterated it before eating a bowl of soup containing the mushrooms. I think I need to sit her down and explain the Precautionary Principle again. I'm 99.999% sure but who knows what happens if I'm wrong so here's the sample for the toxicologist. I understand now why mushroom hunters have their favorite spots. If you've seen chantrelles in the same spot for years and have never seen any doppelgangers in the area, you're a little more sure that what you have is actually chantrelles.
- robsh 2y agoChanterelles are not a great example as their look-alikes are easily distinguishable. Furthermore, they exist in symbiosis/parasitism with particular tree roots as a host. When you return to the same spot you’re harvesting new fruiting bodies of the same organism that you visited last time.
- hinkley 2y agoAnd yet most edible mushrooms do have these associations. Even saprophytic species will take a number of years to devour a nurse log, so that fallen oak or doug-fir will feed you many times. And then there are truffles...
- pyinstallwoes 2y agoI don’t understand this comment for some reason… what am I not getting as the point? I don’t know my mushrooms.