4 ms·
I am a layperson, but it seems to me that scientists are discussing these topics for at least a decade (for example since L'Aquila in 2009): See section 2.2: ht
by JPLeRouzic 2y ago
I am a layperson, but it seems to me that scientists are discussing these topics for at least a decade (for example since L'Aquila in 2009): See section 2.2: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.03652 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.03652
or
https://arxiv.org/abs/0905.2782 https://arxiv.org/abs/0905.2782
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.06592 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2205.06592
https://arxiv.org/abs/0910.0797 https://arxiv.org/abs/0910.0797
- T-A 2y agoLonger than that. This guy, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Didier_Sornette https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Didier_Sornette made a name for himself a couple of decades ago with an approach to predicting earthquakes, financial crashes and other catastrophes: https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.022581999 https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.022581999
- Loughla 2y agoWhy do I think that he is responsible for writing his own Wikipedia entry?
- heavenlyblue 2y agoLooks like a total whack with loads of credentials
- gravescale 2y agoOh he absolutely did: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Didier_Sornette&action=history&offset=20180126220327%7C822527966&limit=100 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Didier_Sornette&a... Any edits he made that aren't his own page are editing in references to his own work in other articles.
- Pompidou 2y agoFun fact : 'sornette' means 'poppycock' in french.