4 ms·
Presumably Apple could still legally restrict malware because they are not distributing their own versions of malware, yes?
by DetroitThrow 2y ago
Presumably Apple could still legally restrict malware because they are not distributing their own versions of malware, yes?
- stavros 2y agoBut then they can restrict anything, on the basis that the software they're restricting does more than their software.
- DetroitThrow 2y agoI was being a little tongue-in-cheek, but I find your premise very fun when thinking about how quickly it can be taken to extremes with criminal or civil damages. Thankfully, our legal systems are much better equipped to deal with ambiguity like this than I think you are proposing.
- stavros 2y agoI guess I was more saying that ambiguous laws can cause more harm than good, but then I was basing that on the title of the article of a summary of a translation of a summary of a law, so I'm probably wrong :P