>If the USA makes the precedent that it can enforce its domestic law on actions happening in other countries... Again, there is already ample precedent for thi

>If the USA makes the precedent that it can enforce its domestic law on actions happening in other countries... Again, there is already ample precedent for this https://www.trade.gov/us-foreign-corrupt-practices-act https://www.trade.gov/us-foreign-corrupt-practices-act this applies to any U.S company engaging in business in another country. >I think the difference here is that the US is enforcing US law on an operation in a foreign country by a company that operates in the US. Well, perhaps that Chiquita used to be an American company affects the situation, not sure here, since Chiquita is nowadays a Swiss company.