> but it’s also not the case that they’re portrayed as entirely positive and complete. This I agree with. A big part of the fun of the series is that Asimov co

> but it’s also not the case that they’re portrayed as entirely positive and complete. This I agree with. A big part of the fun of the series is that Asimov constantly plays with these laws. Thanks for the clarification. (I still completely disagree that "parody of rationalists who are so uncreative they expect a ruleset can actually impose control" was the intent. I believe not only the word "parody" is to throw away, but the whole sentence with it too. I understand better your stance now though)