> "Yeah they might have a pseudo-monopoly but their product is good, I think the 30% cut is fine." would be laughed at in most other sectors. In most other sec

> "Yeah they might have a pseudo-monopoly but their product is good, I think the 30% cut is fine." would be laughed at in most other sectors. In most other sectors the bar is higher. They've earned their near-monopoly fair and square (unlike Apple, they don't do anything to block competing marketplaces - they're not even preinstalled) by being head and shoulders above their competitors in terms of quality - the fact that that's due to those competitors all sawing their own legs off doesn't change that.