5 ms·
Betteridge's law of headlines: no
by bugbuddy 2y ago
Betteridge's law of headlines: no
- dietr1ch 2y agoYou'll need the following law too, No clickbaity article is worth reading.
- blowski 2y agoPlease don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something. (From the guidelines)
- binary132 2y agoFine then: “don’t write articles with question headlines or people can safely assume the answer is no.”
- dietr1ch 2y agoI like the idea of respect where this comes from, but I think that titles have been perverted by SEO way too much and at some point I need writers to stop trying to lure me for my own good. I wish we can get descriptive, boring, but accurate titles back.
- blowski 2y agoDescriptive titles have their place, but so do titles that arouse curiousity and need you to read TFA.
- rpigab 2y agoI hate clickbait, but this doesn't look like this one is, because it's not misleading, it's not trying to hide something to get you to click, and does not lure you with information that's not in the article.
- mdp2021 2y agoThe uninformed preliminary answer instead is yes: loaded dice can produce better values. The article is about using LLMs in an evolutionary framework to design better algorithms for LLM advancement, with particular occasional regard to preference optimization algorithms - and guess what, it seems it worked.