4 ms·
Should Arq use Rackspace (I'm the author of Arq)? So far it's only been using S3 because that has always seemed to me to be the best option.
by sreitshamer 14y ago
Should Arq use Rackspace (I'm the author of Arq)? So far it's only been using S3 because that has always seemed to me to be the best option.
- rb2k_ 14y agoSeeing as you build your own 'filesystem' on top of a simple key/value interface, I think advancing the backend support might be good 'low hanging fruit'. It doesn't even have to be something as 'cloudy' as rackspace, support for something like webdav as an ARQ backend would also be nice. That being said, I have actually no idea about the codebase and user base, so this could be a completely wrong assumption :) Personally, my biggest 'problem' with Arq at the moment is, that the iPhone client works, but I'm missing stupid small things like thumbnail previews for uploaded images.
- lmoorman 14y agoWould love to see it - for cloud files - and all swift deployments (the whole cloud files source is open sourced as part of openstack). let us know if we can help in any way.