4 ms·
Hmm i very strongly disagree. It was immediately apparent to me even on the first cook how vastly superior the surface was to any standard Lodge or whatever. No
by Exuma 2y ago
Hmm i very strongly disagree. It was immediately apparent to me even on the first cook how vastly superior the surface was to any standard Lodge or whatever. Nothing wrong with Lodge, I have those too, but I was very surprised. TBH i wasnt really expecting much, my expectations were very low when I got it on a whim as I kept hearing people rave about it.
The seasoning over time is also vastly superior because of these tiny grooves. I buy the skillet one as a gift for people and its pretty much unanimous that it's their favorite.
Not trying to hype, its just legitimately one of my favorite pans
- Exuma 2y agoI forgot to mention if you get the griddle (Sorry, i kept calling it a skillet before, i meant this one: https://fieldcompany.com/collections/cast-iron-griddles/products/no-9-round-cast-iron-griddle https://fieldcompany.com/collections/cast-iron-griddles/prod...) If anyone gets that.... cook some smash burgers in it and it gets the best seasoning ive ever seen, very quickly.
- HeyLaughingBoy 2y ago$185? WTF? Mine was like $10. It's a sheet of iron, FFS, not gold laminated.
- rpdillon 2y ago> It was immediately apparent to me even on the first cook how vastly superior the surface was to any standard Lodge or whatever. Can you expand on this? What was different on the first use that made its superiority so obvious so quickly? I have only a rudimentary understanding of cookware, so the difference between a $10 cast iron pan and a $200 cast iron pan isn't immediately apparent.