> I was curious about the lack of definitive evidence in this follow-up story. The reporters followup story reports on 1) his own original story and 2) how oth

> I was curious about the lack of definitive evidence in this follow-up story. The reporters followup story reports on 1) his own original story and 2) how other news shops 'customized' [ed] the original story. 1) He repeated the original story. 2) He said what the downstream stories said. "Lack of definitive evidence" is not what this is.