Wait what? In Haskell the types are usually directly inferrable from the arguments they're being used as, and when you put a type annotation it's usually not e

Wait what? In Haskell the types are usually directly inferrable from the arguments they're being used as, and when you put a type annotation it's usually not explicit types (Num a => a -> b -> c). I almost never bother putting types in Haskell, unless I want to guarantee some constraint, in which case I typically use typeclasses. Maybe I'm just weird but I don't think so. One of the very few things I actually like about Haskell is how good the type inference is.