3 ms·
I was curious about the lack of definitive evidence in this follow-up story. I would think they'd want to have some sort of fact-checking from an unbiased sourc
by gnicholas 2y ago
I was curious about the lack of definitive evidence in this follow-up story. I would think they'd want to have some sort of fact-checking from an unbiased source. The tribe is saying it's embarrassing that people think they're addicted to porn, and they're the only source for saying that this is untrue.
What happened to the journalistic motto: "if your mother says she loves you, check it out"? [1]
1: https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2003/if-your-mother-says-she-loves-you-a-reporters-cautionary-tale/ https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2003/if-your-mothe...
- WarOnPrivacy 2y ago> I was curious about the lack of definitive evidence in this follow-up story. The reporters followup story reports on 1) his own original story and 2) how other news shops 'customized' [ed] the original story. 1) He repeated the original story. 2) He said what the downstream stories said. "Lack of definitive evidence" is not what this is.