> information would be sent "back in time" You are wrong. Instantaneous communications is possible, and the information would merely be sluggish (like a signal

> information would be sent "back in time" You are wrong. Instantaneous communications is possible, and the information would merely be sluggish (like a signal with a much longer sync rate) not go "back in time." Besides, one cannot travel at the speed of light, that is science fiction. An ~80% clip is probably as fast, or comfortably fast as we will ever likely get (in a thousand years at our rate of development.) And you're right, I am well read, and have fifteen years of experience communicating with disembodied jackasses through entanglement (and I've been on the other side of the world, these signals are not propagated classically.) Good luck with your studies, don't let your certainties impair your learning.