3 ms·
You posted basically the same thing I posted right before I did, and I completely agree with it. It's not like we will ever get to a point where we say "all th
by tombert 2y ago
You posted basically the same thing I posted right before I did, and I completely agree with it.
It's not like we will ever get to a point where we say "all the potential work that could happen is done!". There's always more work to do, as human resources get freed up they get reallocated to other tasks.
It's sort of like Gustafson's Law [1]; it's easy to see all the work we have right now as automate-able and therefore assume "there won't be any jobs", but I think that's making an incorrect assumption that the number of jobs is a fixed size, and I just flatly think this is not true.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustafson%27s_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gustafson%27s_law