3 ms·
> The issue is that the Nuvia arch license had extra terms that the Qualcomm one didn't. > Qualcomm bought a company because they had a license arm wouldn’t se
by colechristensen 2y ago
> The issue is that the Nuvia arch license had extra terms that the Qualcomm one didn't.
> Qualcomm bought a company because they had a license arm wouldn’t sell them.
These statements aren't different. You're disagreeing by slightly rewording what I wrote.
- Tuna-Fish 2y agoNo. Qualcomm bought Nuvia not because they wanted the license Nuvia had, because that license was server-only, with a "don't compete with our stuff on mobile" carveout, but because they wanted the IP. The license that Qualcomm has is strictly better than what Nuvia had, and no-one wants the Nuvia license.