Notably, when he offended again, the court in that case ruled that the exclusionary rule did not apply for probation revocation hearings, unless the police misc

Notably, when he offended again, the court in that case ruled that the exclusionary rule did not apply for probation revocation hearings, unless the police misconduct was egregious. So, the video was admitted in that case. https://casetext.com/case/people-v-chahal https://casetext.com/case/people-v-chahal Side note: California's Truth-in-Evidence clause in 1982 Proposition 8 forbids state exclusion of evidence requirements which are more stringent than that required under the federal Constitution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1982_California_Proposition_8 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1982_California_Proposition_8