I feel like the article contradicts itself in this point: > Investors and founders both tend to think that if employees knew founders were getting liquidity th

I feel like the article contradicts itself in this point: > Investors and founders both tend to think that if employees knew founders were getting liquidity that that would negatively impact employee morale (it wouldn’t) > If employees realize they are taking more risk than the founders, [...] maybe they'll start yelling: "I'M TAKING SO MUCH RISK, IT'S SO HARD TO BUILD A COMPANY, I DON'T EVEN HAVE ACCESS TO LIQUIDITY!!!". And maybe they're right. How is "not impact morale" and giving an example of employees shouting as a possible outcome when they find out not contradict each other?