3 ms·
The writing is clearly on the wall for the "internet" as there is no visible restoring force. If its not dead already, its getting pretty close. It is a sort o
by openrisk 2y ago
The writing is clearly on the wall for the "internet" as there is no visible restoring force. If its not dead already, its getting pretty close.
It is a sort of tragedy of the digital commons, where the commons in this instance is the availability of extremely usable digital channel for people to communicate online in a decentralized way.
The early pioneers were really excited about the empowering potential of all this, but alas they did not work out the full dynamics of human nature (seeking short term profit, influence and control) especially when it is combined with the amplifying impact of automation and algorithms.
In short, the channel is being ruined by noise, the signal is swamped, the digital commons is being overgrazed and dying.
Nobody feels responsible for this. The stewardship of this most unique resource that was gifted to us by the digital age is laughable. A cacophony of commercial and state interests that have not produced a single positive development in the last thirty years since the invention of the web.
- roody15 2y ago“ but alas they did not work out the full dynamics of human nature (seeking short term profit, influence and control) ” Has anyone worked out this … in terms of governance or anyone organized grouping of humans?
- openrisk 2y agoArguably yes, though it varies by domain. The closest equivalent to the internet would seem to be printed information technology (books, journals, newpapers etc.). While certainly not without problems of all sorts, there are so many lessons there on how to mitigate the worst abuses. Ironically the "internet" is destroying that universe as well, without actually offering any workable replacement.