4 ms·
I'm just going by the article linked here, isn't that what you can see? It says he attended the conference and wouldn't say who told him about it. Not sure how
by killingtime74 2y ago
I'm just going by the article linked here, isn't that what you can see? It says he attended the conference and wouldn't say who told him about it. Not sure how the YouTube links up to it unless either of those accounts is just wrong?
Are you sure the YouTube video is of the same hearing day? Maybe it hasnt happened yet in the YouTube footage? Usually these are multiple days
- ncallaway 2y ago> I'm just going by the article linked here, I think you must've misread something then. The article doesn't say the lawyer attended the conference. The ex-parte meeting took place in the morning _before_ the YouTube video. The YouTube video covers the proceedings which occur in open court, which is what the article is a summary of. I've read a fair amount about this at this point, and I'm 100% confident that the lawyer that was briefly arrested did not at any point in time attend the ex-parte meeting. The only confrontation that took place was in the court room, in open court, as shown in the YouTube livestream linked above.
- killingtime74 2y agoAt this point I think we can agree that the article is poorly written because we don't even unambiguously understand what actually happened.
- ncallaway 2y agoI still don’t know what part of the article leads you to believe that there was a confrontation at the judge’s chambers. I don’t see anything in the article that makes me think that.