5 ms·
This flies directly in the face of technologies such as Deep Blue and AlphaGo. They excel in tiny domains previously thought to be the pinnacle of intelligence,
by educasean 2y ago
This flies directly in the face of technologies such as Deep Blue and AlphaGo. They excel in tiny domains previously thought to be the pinnacle of intelligence, and now they dominate humans. Are they AGI in your definition?
- bubblyworld 2y agoSee my response to the other commenter. In these cases as well I would conclude it's very weak evidence of AGI, so I don't think we disagree. Edit: I think maybe the disagreement here is about the nature of evidence. I think there can be evidence that something is AGI even if it isn't, in fact, AGI. You seem to believe that if there's any evidence that something is AGI, it must be AGI, I think?
- educasean 2y agoI personally don't find this line of rhetoric useful or relevant. Let's agree to disagree.
- bubblyworld 2y agoOkay, that's fair. But to be clear - this is a theorem of probability theory, not rhetoric.