Conclusion from the video: """ Meed for 30 like WTF is that well I guess it technically matched my requirements so I'll give it a B minus and call it a a i

Conclusion from the video: """ Meed for 30 like WTF is that well I guess it technically matched my requirements so I'll give it a B minus and call it a a it does generally reduce the number of syllables in a paragraph by 30% I suppose it even has some kind of pro to it I was kind of hoping it would be mostly intelligible for English speakers without having to learn a bunch of new words but that's not exactly the case there's just too many words to make a mapping that's immediately obvious and unambiguous at least with my simple method most individual word mapping seem """ If the goal was to be intelligible, you could probably adapt the method to be more successful. For one, I would drop the requirement to not create more homophones. Since you're hoping people will guess what the word means based on what it sounds like, you can afford to have it sound like several things and let them distinguish based on context. Besides that, according to the established rules, you could turn a single multisyllabic word into multiple monosyllabic words. Suppose you turned "better" into "more good". This is technically monosyllabic, and immediately obvious in meaning to any english speaker. You might also squeeze multiple synonyms into a single word, for example "attempt" could be turned into "try", rather than attempting to come up with a legible one syllable variant of it. Doing these things wouldn't be as faithful to the seeming goals of the project, but the result might be more interesting in terms of semi-comprehensible english.