5 ms·

Some of these sentences seem sort of related. You're just linking to Google searches and providing random snippets from linked sites. Overall this comment and

by niij 2y ago

Some of these sentences seem sort of related. You're just linking to Google searches and providing random snippets from linked sites. Overall this comment and many of the comments in your history look like spam.

qingcharles 2y ago
It's the style of comments you get on a lot of conspiracy sites. I see comment styles like that on a lot of articles linked from places like rense.com.
- westurner 2y ago
  No, these are all hand prepared. This is called research, and it does require citations. Please do not harass overachievers who do the research work instead of just talking to talk. #areyouarobotorsimilar
  - qingcharles 2y ago
    I certainly didn't think the comments weren't human-generated. I was actually defending you. I just think your style of commenting comes across as unusual here, which is why it attracts attention. On other parts of the Internet the style you use is more common and would not raise eyebrows.
westurner 2y ago
Compared to aigen with citations found for whatever was generated without consideration for truth and ethical reasoning? The heuristics should be improved, then; we shouldn't ask me to put these in PDFs without typed edges to URLs and schema.org/Datasets, to support a schema.org/Claim or a ClaimReview in a SocialMediaPosting about a NewsArticle about a ScholarlyArticle :about a Thing skos:Concept with a :url. Would you have deep linked your way to those resources (which are useful enough to be re-cited here for later reference) without the researcher doing it for you? Technical writing courses for example advise to include the searches that you used in the databases that you found oracles in, in order to help indicate the background research bias prior to the hypothesis at least. Transparency and Accountability: https://westurner.github.io/hnlog/ https://westurner.github.io/hnlog/ So, this sort of cited input is valuable and should be valued not as link spam but as linked edge-dense research sans generatble prose.
- niij 2y ago
  > Technical writing courses for example advise to include the searches that you used in the databases that you found oracles in, in order to help indicate the background research bias prior to the hypothesis at least. I'm not writing a doctoral thesis. These comments are not my livelihood. I'm just sharing industry knowledge on a topic I know about. Your random links without context, some of the links to literal Google searches, are not in any way useful or interesting.
  - westurner 2y ago
    I haven't asked you to do anything. Thanks for your time

by niij 2y ago

qingcharles 2y ago

It's the style of comments you get on a lot of conspiracy sites. I see comment styles like that on a lot of articles linked from places like rense.com.

westurner 2y ago
No, these are all hand prepared. This is called research, and it does require citations. Please do not harass overachievers who do the research work instead of just talking to talk. #areyouarobotorsimilar
- qingcharles 2y ago
  I certainly didn't think the comments weren't human-generated. I was actually defending you. I just think your style of commenting comes across as unusual here, which is why it attracts attention. On other parts of the Internet the style you use is more common and would not raise eyebrows.

westurner 2y ago

Compared to aigen with citations found for whatever was generated without consideration for truth and ethical reasoning? The heuristics should be improved, then; we shouldn't ask me to put these in PDFs without typed edges to URLs and schema.org/Datasets, to support a schema.org/Claim or a ClaimReview in a SocialMediaPosting about a NewsArticle about a ScholarlyArticle :about a Thing skos:Concept with a :url. Would you have deep linked your way to those resources (which are useful enough to be re-cited here for later reference) without the researcher doing it for you? Technical writing courses for example advise to include the searches that you used in the databases that you found oracles in, in order to help indicate the background research bias prior to the hypothesis at least. Transparency and Accountability: https://westurner.github.io/hnlog/ https://westurner.github.io/hnlog/ So, this sort of cited input is valuable and should be valued not as link spam but as linked edge-dense research sans generatble prose.

niij 2y ago
> Technical writing courses for example advise to include the searches that you used in the databases that you found oracles in, in order to help indicate the background research bias prior to the hypothesis at least. I'm not writing a doctoral thesis. These comments are not my livelihood. I'm just sharing industry knowledge on a topic I know about. Your random links without context, some of the links to literal Google searches, are not in any way useful or interesting.
- westurner 2y ago
  I haven't asked you to do anything. Thanks for your time