6 ms·
Elon, was just outed by his own xAI, https://grook.ai/share?id=e269e88a7b1a71eff4f176c864b30161&hh,=0 https://grook.ai/share?id=e269e88a7b1a71eff4f176c864b30161
by throw9474 2y ago
Elon, was just outed by his own xAI, https://grook.ai/share?id=e269e88a7b1a71eff4f176c864b30161&hh,=0 https://grook.ai/share?id=e269e88a7b1a71eff4f176c864b30161&h...
- digging 2y agoWhy do I keep seeing this exact comment and what the hell is grook.ai? Can you provide some context?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- throw9474 2y ago[flagged]
- mewpmewp2 2y ago[flagged]
- throw9474 2y agoIt's way more direct if you read what it says Elon fans downvote it though.
- mewpmewp2 2y agoPlease explain to me? I may be too dumb to understand the inbetween lines here.
- mewpmewp2 2y agoI'm not an Elon fan, but surely you agree that earth is probably going to be destroyed soon by either WW3 or any numerous climate change issues?
- andrewflnr 2y agoNo. Climate change will be bad but won't render Earth uninhabitable. It probably won't even be as bad as any of the major mass extinctions we know about. WW3 is not assured, and all the major powers understand why nukes are a terrible idea. Even if things go hot between US/CN I bet it'll stay conventional. Furthermore if those disasters do happen, they will surely kill a martian colony, since it won't actually be independent of earth for decades, in terms of spare parts, genetically viable population, etc, even if they do manage to grow their own food and oxygen.
- wazer5 2y agoAmazing Reddit discussion on this: https://www.reddit.com/r/Starlink/comments/1daovey/elons_xai_chatbot_says_starlink_is_for_nuclear_war/ https://www.reddit.com/r/Starlink/comments/1daovey/elons_xai...
- mewpmewp2 2y agoWell yes, but I wouldn't be surprised if Starlink was for nuclear? Why am I being downvoted here? US, Europe, west, and democracy in general, at current times needs to be 100% at its game on the most significant power in human history. Ultimately dictatorship is not going to give up, and they want to prove democracy is wrong, and at some points nuclear weapons are going to be used for that. We are at pre-war right now. But it's a matter of time for all of it to escalate to all out war. We must be prepared for it.
- doctorwho42 2y agoIf WW3 happens anytime in the next 100 years, a colony on Mars would not survive because they would eventually stop receiving shipments of earth made tech. For example, replacement IC's or other silicon wafer based technology. Not like you are going to see a fab built on Mars in the first 20-50 years of a Mars colony.
- mewpmewp2 2y agoIt probably won't survive, but it doesn't mean that it shouldn't be tried for all different sorts of reasons. We don't know when a danger will occur or materialize, but we should begin to make sure our eggs are spread out as soon as possible to have the highest odds of survival as species.
- talldayo 2y ago> If humanity was in harmony No, stop it. Humanity cannot attain harmony because disparity exists. People are different, we have different beliefs in how rule should be attained and held, and we are willing to fight each other to the death to prolong that way of life. The concept of "perfect order" is nonsense, because it would require so much concentrated bigotry that nothing would possibly ever change or be unique. There is no harmony for us to reach, besides the mutual acceptance that we exist in constant resource competition with our fellow man. That's all there is. Elon Musk isn't your savior, he's a fickle authoritarian that would destroy society like he destroyed his own image, if he got the chance. You guys need to stop obsessing over the same three popular celebrities and move on, this stuff is embarrassing (even by HN standards) and a waste of both our time. Send it to TMZ and get ignored by them, if you're desperate for attention.
- mewpmewp2 2y agoThere is no harmony at current state, because that is how natural selection has developed us. Although it would still be better if democracy ruled the World rather than dictatorship together with democracy. Elon Musk is not the saviour, but none the less the goals he set make sense. The other part of your reply is quite ugly unbased attacks from you.