2 ms·
I totally agree. Static linking is essentially easier for people who don't want to care. But ignoring security does not mean it solves it, on the contrary. Sta
by palata 2y ago
I totally agree. Static linking is essentially easier for people who don't want to care. But ignoring security does not mean it solves it, on the contrary.
Static linking comes with a lot of issues, just like dynamic linking is not perfect. I really think it depends on the use-case, and that's why I want to have the choice.