3 ms·

Have worked with several trans folks at major legacy corps like IBM and while I'm sure there may have been rank-and-file issues, discrimination was not tolerate

• groby_b 2y ago
  "discrimination was not tolerated by mgmt in the latter 90s" That's a really nice thought. Having lived as a trans woman in the 90s, it does not match reality though. Management is, always, a mixed bag. More and more managers indeed do not tolerate discrimination, but even in the face of policies, it exists. It certainly existed in the 90s, in very large patches. As for corporate policies, IBM added theirs (gender identity specifically) in 2002. HP had GLEN in 1995 - "Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual employee network". You'll note gender identity isn't part of that, though. (And bisexual is a silent B, I guess ;) If anybody knows when they included gender identity, I'd love to hear about it! Before that, it was patchwork-y, and your best bet was finding a corner of the corporation that was supportive. And never raising your head to far, just in case. (Many of us did anyways, but more often than not, that had indeed the expected outcome) Don't get me wrong, I'm happy and grateful HP & IBM were at the forefront of these policies. But it wasn't quite as easy a transition.
• whoknowsidont 2y ago
  >discrimination was not tolerated by mgmt in the latter 90s Talk is cheap.
• houseplant 2y ago
  non-discrimination policies are one thing. Being able to accept and acknowledge you made a mistake and vehemently admit it to the world is a whole other thing.