5 ms·
Does it? so if the content can't be auto-upgraded to HTTPS, will be blocked. I rather have a padlock with a warning that... a broken website because missing co
by reidrac 2y ago
Does it? so if the content can't be auto-upgraded to HTTPS, will be blocked.
I rather have a padlock with a warning that... a broken website because missing content?
- kstrauser 2y agoI'd say the website was already broken. I'd rather block content than have insecure resources fetched with a potentially sensitive referrer. That is, I don't want `https://example.com/why-does-my-butt-hurt https://example.com/why-does-my-butt-hurt` to fetch `http://media.example.com/spacer.gif http://media.example.com/spacer.gif` over the coffee shop's open wi-fi.
- giancarlostoro 2y agoVery solid point and why it matters. I wonder if other browsers are or will do the same.
- ygjb 2y agoThere is an article linked in the release notes that allows users to opt-in to a less secure option. https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2024/06/05/firefox-will-upgrade-more-mixed-content-in-version-127/ https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2024/06/05/firefox-will-up...