20 ms·

Hmm. An AI trained to maximize dopamine could be a very bad thing. (It won't be stated that way. It will be trained to "maximize engagement", but it amounts

Hmm. An AI trained to maximize dopamine could be a very bad thing. (It won't be stated that way. It will be trained to "maximize engagement", but it amounts to the same thing.)

Tao3300 2y ago
> could be is
islandert 2y ago
TikTok?
pmtcc 2y ago
Our brains have been under attack for years. Zuckerberg, Dorsey, and company have already spent decades and billions doing just that. With capabilities already in the AI realm.
- baq 2y ago
  Still can’t decide how terrified should I be that somehow zuck is the good guy in the AI wars.
  - asystole 2y ago
    No clue what would give you that idea.
    - fragmede 2y ago
      llama3
pjc50 2y ago
> An AI trained to maximize dopamine could be a very bad thing. Spelled "profitable". This is definitely something that's already happened/happening; see algorithmic timelines and the widespread sudden legalization and acceptance of gambling.
noobermin 2y ago
Too many people are worried about hallucinating AIs somehow taking over nukes instead of them juicing the dopamine machines
mr_toad 2y ago
You don’t need AI for that, “old fashioned” ML has been doing it for a decade.