3 ms·
You argued if NATO doesn't back down ww3 is more likely. I argue the opposite. As for 2+2 - my point is that some things are simple, and making them seem compl
by ajuc 2y ago
You argued if NATO doesn't back down ww3 is more likely. I argue the opposite.
As for 2+2 - my point is that some things are simple, and making them seem complex is an excuse not to do anything about them.
This is what happened in 2014. It was simple imperial land grab. It was preventable. But Russia and useful idiots muddled the water long enough that the help never arrived.
This is what I think should be prevented. Because every time the west appeases Russia it makes ww3 more likely.