3 ms·
If you're being serious, then you're suggesting that it would be perfectly healthy for a person to literally just lie in bed all day and only interact with peop
by naasking 2y ago
If you're being serious, then you're suggesting that it would be perfectly healthy for a person to literally just lie in bed all day and only interact with people virtually.
If you think that isn't healthy, then you are acknowledging that virtual groups are not a replacement for physical interaction, even if you disagree with others on how much physical interaction is required.
- squigz 2y agoI don't believe that's what I suggested at all. I believe I asked GP why they believed what they said.
- WarOnPrivacy 2y ago> If you're being serious, then you're suggesting that it would be perfectly healthy for a person to literally just lie in bed all day and only interact with people virtually. It's what adults have (mostly) left for (most US) kids to do - when adults replaced free roaming areas with roads and private property. ref: https://i.redd.it/32yuwrnvgi491.jpg https://i.redd.it/32yuwrnvgi491.jpg As a child, I could walk in any direction and either find area to explore (safe from interfering adults) or find other kids. Same as my parents, g-parents, ancestors going back 10s x 1000s of years. My kids had nowhere to go. Same for their peers all over. I'm fine with taking away their ~only practical method of connecting as long as we return the spaces kids had for connecting (thruout history).