4 ms·
Yea but business needs are constantly evolving, most of the time one step ahead of the accurate understanding of what needs to be done. We get paid, in theory,
by rnewme 2y ago
Yea but business needs are constantly evolving, most of the time one step ahead of the accurate understanding of what needs to be done. We get paid, in theory, to build that, but main expense is not actually building, it's finding what needs to be done and then maintaining it. No ai can address that imho
- chaos_emergent 2y agoIf you don’t think an AI could do that then I think you need more imagination and to follow the OOMs
- packetlost 2y agoI think "could" is substantially different from "practically will in a time-frame that matters" and the former is being used as a shortcut for the latter.
- elicksaur 2y ago“OOMs”? Not sure what that means, but I’m guessing you don’t mean out of memory errors.
- chaos_emergent 2y agoorders of magnitude
- dontchooseanick 2y agoCame exactly to say this. We often don't solve technical problems or write algorithm. We're here to understand a client who doesn't know what he wants. Good luck for the general purpose AI to solve this [1] "If Architects had to work like Programmers" [1] https://archive.is/r4l6C https://archive.is/r4l6C