4 ms·
By no means contraindicating your (harmless) micro-apophenia, but "Orwell >>> Galois >>> we" in terms of gambling nous, might explain the difficulty of modellin
by vinnyvichy 2y ago
By no means contraindicating your (harmless) micro-apophenia, but "Orwell >>> Galois >>> we" in terms of gambling nous, might explain the difficulty of modelling their emotional states or purchases (ie of insurance for theories of uncertain import)
L: https://vuir.vu.edu.au/18204/1/PETSINIS_1995compressed.pdf https://vuir.vu.edu.au/18204/1/PETSINIS_1995compressed.pdf
& As for the 3-fold gluing/halving (the collatz avemaria?) u might have missed the other retrospective
https://minervawisdom.com/2019/06/20/ciceros-republic-the-cyclical-theory-of-constitutions/ https://minervawisdom.com/2019/06/20/ciceros-republic-the-cy...
- 082349872349872 2y agoodd, Petsinis' Galois was left-handed, but the record of the autopsy describes a right-hander: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k267462/f100.item https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k267462/f100.item (do they describe him as having had a normally small cerebellum, or abnormally?)
- vinnyvichy 2y agoHmmm perhaps you refer to studies such as the following? https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=38488#:~:text=Left%2Dhanders%20with%20attention%20problems,as%20a%20measure%20of%20impulsivity https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=38488....
- 082349872349872 2y agoIndeed, although I think in Petsinis' case it was just a moment of inattention (bonus Homer). Given that I read very few XIX autopsy reports, it's completely unclear to me if they're giving a standard report or drawing attention to something. (it's even unclear to me why they should have been paying so much attention to the cranium when the problem clearly lay in the abdomen? early phrenology?)