2 ms·
The problem there is college. You'd have to either make college admissions much less "holistic", or make sure there are non-college paths to success (something
by lmm 2y ago
The problem there is college. You'd have to either make college admissions much less "holistic", or make sure there are non-college paths to success (something people have been trying hard for many years with little success), or both.
- ksplicer 2y agoYou almost hit on it, but I think the real problem is the economy got worse first. That trickled down to increase pressure in college and high school.
- ndriscoll 2y agoOr just go to a state school. My alma mater apparently has an 87% acceptance rate. My extracurriculars were playing Counter Strike, Battlefield 2, and WoWcrack. It doesn't seem to have had any negative effect on my life.
- analog31 2y agoBoth of my kids did just fine at state schools. One at the state "flagship" university, and the other at one of the regional schools.
- vundercind 2y agoThis has to be some segment of the middle-class and especially newly-upper-middle-by-income-but-not-socialization running into this trouble. Parents “under” that set just send their kids to [name of state] State where OK test scores and grades do the job. That’s a large majority of parents of college-bound kids, right there. Parents “above” that set let the legacy admissions advantage and golfs-with-Ivy-admissions-officers prep school counselor sort it out. Kids seriously looking to get into highly-selective schools are a minority. This does mean you’re opting your kids out of elite schools by not playing that game from an early age, but hey, you and everybody (the colloquial “everybody”—most folks) else.