3 ms·
Regardless of what people said or are saying now, the main difference is that people that bought the initial iPhone loved it and used it all the time. Most Visi
by dmarcos 2y ago
Regardless of what people said or are saying now, the main difference is that people that bought the initial iPhone loved it and used it all the time. Most Vision Pro owners stopped using it 2-3 weeks after purchase.
The iphone built on existing product categories with product-market fit: PDAs, cellphones, MP3 players, smartphones. The path to improve the initial product was clear. There was a clear target.
Vision Pro launches in an unproven market (VR/AR) with only a handful of games with significant adoption that AVP can't run as well as competitors due to lack of controllers (e.g Beat Saber experience would be worse due to higher latency of hand tracking). Path to improve the product is uncertain because the target market is not clear yet.
I both bought iPhone and Vision Pro on day one. And my enthusiasm and engagement with each product are completely different.
- kalleboo 2y agoThe Vision Pro is probably closer to the Apple Watch launch - the Apple Watch launched as this weird high-end fashion thing with like expensive ceramic and gold options, and it didn't really know what it wanted to do. In a generation or two, they realized it was fitness and health which was the target market and honed in on that. Not saying the trajectory will be the same - Apple Watch is inherently both cheaper and easier to use since you just strap it on your arm instead of closing out the world, just saying they both started out as products without a really compelling purpose.
- asadotzler 2y agoApple Watch is an cheap iPhone accessory. Vision Pro is an overpriced strap-on full facial PC. There's no comparison between the two that makes any sense at all.
- kalleboo 2y agoThe comparison is that some devices need time to find their use case