4 ms·
I think post mortems often get into a lot of sidestepping the actual blatant issue and indulge in intellectual complex worldbuilding. Even though the one by Tr
by ilrwbwrkhv 2y ago
I think post mortems often get into a lot of sidestepping the actual blatant issue and indulge in intellectual complex worldbuilding.
Even though the one by Triplebyte is one of the better ones, what this commenter is saying is more realistic and honest. He is the market after all. Triplebyte's "head of product" has the same value as a random commentor when it comes to the market rejecting them; I don't know why it would be any different.
If passing Triblebyte would mean straight to team match that would be solving the actual problem. Otherwise what he is saying is true: they simply added another layer of friction.
- rachofsunshine 2y agoOP chiming in here to say that there's truth to this perspective. It is very easy to miss the forest for the trees in product work. That being said: the product the top of this thread was talking about did have users and did break even financially, even operating with some pretty major inefficiencies. So while it would be wrong to argue with that poster about what they liked, they are empirically wrong in the claim that no one liked it.